Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: tu'o

From: Pierre Abbat <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 11:08:22 -0400

On Sun, 05 Aug 2001, [email-masked] wrote:
>I think the counterpart of {zo'e} should be {no'o}, not {tu'o}.
>{tu'o} is the counterpart of {zi'o}. At least that's what "used 
>in unary operations" suggests to me.

{no'o} seems to correspond to {zu'i}, not {zo'e}, to me. {tu'o} corresponds to
{zo'e} when used in a sumti and to {zo'e} or {zi'o}, depending on the
operation, when used in a mex.

phma