From xod@sixgirls.org Sun Aug 05 13:15:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 5 Aug 2001 20:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75963 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 20:15:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 5 Aug 2001 20:15:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 20:15:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f75KFD914146 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 16:15:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 16:15:13 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote: > >Jorge, I can understand your recent explanatory post better if I stop > >thinking of "makau" and use "ko'a" in its place. > > And yet it is not the same thing. In {la meris djuno le du'u ko'a > klama le zarci} le listener is expected to identify ko'a, either > because it was previously assigned or from context. How about ko'akau? ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!