From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Aug 05 14:55:46 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 5 Aug 2001 21:55:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 30408 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 21:55:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2001 21:55:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.44) by mta1 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 21:55:46 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 5 Aug 2001 14:55:46 -0700 Received: from 200.69.11.230 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:55:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.230] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: RE: [lojban] ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:55:45 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2001 21:55:46.0147 (UTC) FILETIME=[6169CB30:01C11DF9] From: "Jorge Llambias" la xod cusku di'e >Except that in "I know who went to store", the phrase "who went to store" >really does symbolize an answer to the question. But that is what Jorge >says is false, and I can't find anything in the Book or the archives that >directly contradicts him. I don't know where you got the idea that I say that is false. All I said is that the answer to "who went to the store?" is "John went to the store", not "John". A du'u is always a bridi, even when it contains a kau. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp