From mark@kli.org Sun Aug 05 19:10:18 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: mark@kli.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 6 Aug 2001 02:10:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 18954 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 02:10:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Aug 2001 02:10:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n27.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.2.135) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 02:10:17 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: mark@kli.org Received: from [10.1.4.67] by fh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 06 Aug 2001 02:10:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 02:10:12 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a Message-ID: <9kkua4+nqvr@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 347 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 162.33.229.2 From: mark@kli.org --- In lojban@y..., Invent Yourself wrote: > > I still think this lu'e use works. > > mi djuno lu'e le klama be le zarci > I know who goes to the store > > This means that I know the symbol of the store goer, not that I know the > store goer. This is almost disturbingly non-bad (I don't know if it's actually "good" yet). ~mark