From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Aug 06 08:30:05 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 6 Aug 2001 15:30:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 33873 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 15:29:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Aug 2001 15:29:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 15:29:54 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:29:54 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2001 15:29:54 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 15:29:54 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Aug 2001 15:29:54.0495 (UTC) FILETIME=[A45DCCF0:01C11E8C] From: "Jorge Llambias" la xod cusku di'e >And I'm all for eliminating cmavo in the name of Occam's Razor. ui I hope you join me in my crusade against (amongst other stuff) set gadri and specialized nu's, then. > ko'a ko'e frica le ka ce'u prami ko'i > ko'a ko'e frica le ka ce'u prami ko'ikau > "X differs from Y in who they love" > >Does this imply that ko'a and ko'e love the same value for ko'i? Yes, in both cases. According to some interpretation of the Codex Waldemari, {ko'ikau} would actually be equivalent to {ba'eko'i}. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp