From xod@sixgirls.org Mon Aug 06 11:30:02 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 6 Aug 2001 18:30:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 28966 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 18:28:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Aug 2001 18:28:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 18:28:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f76ISWr24177 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:28:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:28:31 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > la xod cusku di'e > > >And I'm all for eliminating cmavo in the name of Occam's Razor. > > ui I hope you join me in my crusade against (amongst other stuff) > set gadri and specialized nu's, then. I'm not sure about sets actually, but I like the alternatives to nu, and they have different places available as well, albeit rarely used. > > ko'a ko'e frica le ka ce'u prami ko'i > > ko'a ko'e frica le ka ce'u prami ko'ikau > > "X differs from Y in who they love" > > > >Does this imply that ko'a and ko'e love the same value for ko'i? What if ko'i is a mass? Think about 3 men and 2 dogs. > Yes, in both cases. According to some interpretation of > the Codex Waldemari, {ko'ikau} would actually be equivalent > to {ba'eko'i}. Where is that interpretation? It says kau can be attached to ma & da with the same effect, so why not ko'a? ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!