From phma@oltronics.net Mon Aug 06 11:59:05 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 6 Aug 2001 18:59:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 9528 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 18:59:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Aug 2001 18:59:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.86) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 18:59:01 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1239F3C634; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 10:47:46 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Format for Lojban definitions of Lojban brivla Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 10:35:33 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01080610474607.01174@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat I propose that when defining a brivla in Lojban, ko'a, ko'e, ... be used for the terbri, and da, de, di be used for variables internal to the definition. If the first pro-sumti is omitted, it is assumed to be ko'a. For example: mudri: marji lo stani be lo tricu be ko'e panzi: da tsiju ko'e ko'a phma