From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Mon Aug 06 15:19:00 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 6 Aug 2001 22:19:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 74902 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 22:17:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 6 Aug 2001 22:17:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46) by mta1 with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 22:17:35 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.41.128]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010806221733.WZHD6330.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 23:17:33 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 23:16:37 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEIEEIAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <F111yEXUIEAOeIiGXix0000f78e@hotmail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>

Jorge:
> la xod cusku di'e
> 
> >And I'm all for eliminating cmavo in the name of Occam's Razor.
> 
> ui I hope you join me in my crusade against (amongst other stuff)
> set gadri and specialized nu's, then.

You should stick your list on the Wiki so it can be kept tabs
on.

I forget which specialist nu's you have it in for, but note
at least that:

{da za'i mi jmive} = "I am alive"
{da zu'o mi jmive} = "I stay alive"

> > ko'a ko'e frica le ka ce'u prami ko'i
> > ko'a ko'e frica le ka ce'u prami ko'ikau
> > "X differs from Y in who they love"
> >
> >Does this imply that ko'a and ko'e love the same value for ko'i?
> 
> Yes, in both cases. According to some interpretation of
> the Codex Waldemari, {ko'ikau} would actually be equivalent
> to {ba'eko'i}.

My recollection/understanding is that

{mi djuno tu'o du'u ko'a kau broda}
= {tu'o ka ce'u broda goi ko'e zo'u mi djuno tu'o du'u ko'e ko'a ckaji}

--And.

