From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Fri Aug 10 15:34:57 2001
Return-Path: <kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu>
X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 10 Aug 2001 22:34:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 81165 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2001 22:34:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Aug 2001 22:34:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2001 22:34:55 -0000
Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12])
  by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id f7AMYsf09819
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:34:55 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:34:54 -0600 (MDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] RE: Re: Well I guess you do learn something new every
  day...
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010810181022.00cdf320@pop.cais.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0108101627280.4496-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
From: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>


On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:

> >So, the way consensus is set is by the sort of debates Jorge, pc, Xod,
> >me, et al. have been having of late.
>
> "Consensus" that is not followed by usage matching that consensus is
> meaningless. It'll just be forgotten only to have the issue reappear the
> next time someone asks the question. Even the creation of "records" does
> not stop the so-called consensus issues from cropping up again and
again,
> and I don't think the wiki will change this - at least the Lojban List
> archives are searchable now.

And one can find all kinds of amusing things by searching it.

For instance, a thread which looks disturbingly like a number of the
recent ones is:

http://balance.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9602/msg00003.html

Even some of the same participants!


I find it depressingly amusing (.u'i.uinai) that the same points are being
discussed by the same people, five and a half years later.

I suppose it would be too much to hope that people interested in debating
the merits of using Lojban as a developmental toy could go back through
the archives and live vicariously though their old emails?

- Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
Plus =E7a change, plus c'est la m=EAme chose


