From cowan@ccil.org Fri Aug 10 16:01:13 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 10 Aug 2001 23:01:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 46878 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2001 23:01:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Aug 2001 23:01:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2001 23:01:12 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15VLHM-00043g-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:01:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: (C)V'{i|u}V In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010804231742.00b0a310@pop.cais.com> from "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" at "Aug 4, 2001 11:20:36 pm" To: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:01:20 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit: > Because "ci,e" can be pronounced as "ci'e", audiovisual isomorphism > requires that it be equivalent to same for purposes of morphology. Not at all. It merely requires that it be equivalent in all valid words. The word "ci,e" (as opposed to the string of letters "ci,e") does not exist, and need not be equivalent to any word. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter