Subject: Re: [lojban] {kai'i}

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 19:38:16 -0400 (EDT)

And Rosta scripsit:
> Recent distinct threads have established 
> 
> (a) that {ka} is redundant, since {du'u} can serve all the
> functions of current {ka}

It is redundant only in a version of Lojban where you are not permitted
to elide "ce'u".

-- 
John Cowan [email-masked]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter