From cowan@ccil.org Mon Aug 13 04:44:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 11:44:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 77144 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 11:44:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 11:44:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 11:44:14 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15WG92-00005O-00; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:44:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] negating connectives In-Reply-To: <105.7a6cb25.28a83b7e@aol.com> from "pycyn@aol.com" at "Aug 12, 2001 04:05:18 pm" To: pycyn@aol.com Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:44:32 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan pycyn@aol.com scripsit: > I'm not sure I follow, since the example doesn't seem to be an example of > what I took the general case to be. But to try to deal with the general case > first, I suppose that {na'e} would work {p ina'eje q} (I'm not sure the > grammar works here) It doesn't: that's ungrammatical. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter