Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: tu'o (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a

From: "And Rosta" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:14:01 +0100

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > Since both a zi'o-counterpart and a zo'e-counterpart would make sense
> > in mekso, there seems to be a need for a new PA to be a zo'e
> > counterpart. 
> 
> That would be mo'ezo'e.

Oh, yes. 

no'o = mo'e zu'i
???? = mo'e zo'e
???? = mo'e zi'o
tu'o = mo'e ????

--And.