From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Aug 13 11:51:39 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 18:51:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 54314 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 18:50:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 18:50:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.91) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 18:50:46 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:50:46 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:50:46 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution? Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:50:46 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2001 18:50:46.0672 (UTC) FILETIME=[DCEA5100:01C12428] From: "Jorge Llambias" la xod cusku di'e > > mi djuno la djan ce la pol ce la meris > > I know the set {John, Paul, Mary}. > > > > I am not prepared to claim that. > >Of course not. But you're giving away the wrong half of the equation! > >Although you won't say "I know 5", you will say "I know 2 + 2". Not in Lojban I won't. I will say {mi djuno le du'u makau du li resu'ire}. {mi djuno li resu'ire} is as nonsensical as {mi djuno li vo} the way I understand it. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp