From pycyn@aol.com Mon Aug 13 11:58:51 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 18:58:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 74749 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 18:57:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 18:57:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m06.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.161)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 18:57:46 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.9.) id r.cd.ab3c6a8 (660)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:57:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <cd.ab3c6a8.28a97d26@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:57:42 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] New to lojban, any suggestions?
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_cd.ab3c6a8.28a97d26_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_cd.ab3c6a8.28a97d26_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 8/13/2001 12:21:45 PM Central Daylight Time, 
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> PC, don't be an asshole. I use what's best for me. In fact, my primary
> machine at home is a Win98 box. I want to do my lojban flashcarding on
> a unix machine because that way I can leave work and go home and not
> interrupt my session.
> 
> And many of the programs I run on my linux box are physically impossible
> on a Win* box. The OS doesn't support the functionality.
> 

Fine. But don't take a superior attitude towards those of us who use what is 
best (all things considered) for us or complain because the world has not 
produced a particular toy for your favorite private use.
Your final claim is interesting. Since it is prima facie unlikely is there 
there real evidence (beyond "I don't know how to do it") for it.

--part1_cd.ab3c6a8.28a97d26_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/13/2001 12:21:45 PM Central Daylight Time, 
<BR>rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">PC, don't be an asshole. &nbsp;I use what's best for me. &nbsp;In fact, my primary
<BR>machine at home is a Win98 box. &nbsp;I want to do my lojban flashcarding on
<BR>a unix machine because that way I can leave work and go home and not
<BR>interrupt my session.
<BR>
<BR>And many of the programs I run on my linux box are physically impossible
<BR>on a Win* box. &nbsp;The OS doesn't support the functionality.
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>Fine. But don't take a superior attitude towards those of us who use what is 
<BR>best (all things considered) for us or complain because the world has not 
<BR>produced a particular toy for your favorite private use.
<BR>Your final claim is interesting. &nbsp;Since it is prima facie unlikely is there 
<BR>there real evidence (beyond "I don't know how to do it") for it.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_cd.ab3c6a8.28a97d26_boundary--

