From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 13 12:11:51 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 19:11:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 85539 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 19:10:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 19:10:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta2 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 19:10:22 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15WN6T-00037L-00 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:10:21 -0700 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:10:21 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] New to lojban, any suggestions? Message-ID: <20010813121021.G9477@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010813012844.00d69150@pop.cais.com> <9l1op2+k2ts@eGroups.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010813012844.00d69150@pop.cais.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010813021737.00d26e10@pop.cais.com> <20010813084952.K21501@digitalkingdom.org> <3B77F8E9.2050704@reutershealth.com> <20010813101638.N21501@digitalkingdom.org> <3B7824AA.1000901@reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B7824AA.1000901@reutershealth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i From: Robin Lee Powell On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 03:04:10PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > >>Or consider FreePC. Or consider GNUPC. > > > > Never heard of them. What are they? > > > Pascal compilers. FreePC (www.freepascal.org) specializes in Borland > Pascal compatibility for i386 and 680x0 architectures; GNU PC > (http://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/~gnu-pascal/) works over a > larger range of Pascals and machines. Oh, right. Yeah, I tried compiling the thing on Linux. I don't want to talk about that week. > > Besides, I'm not just talking about Linux users. > > > > I'm also talking about Win2k and NT users (whom I'm fairly certain > > won't be able to run it, but I haven't tested) > > > I routinely run DOS programs on Windows NT, including graphic ones. Really? Huh. My bad. > I can't see LogFlash as a problem: it is a very vanilla program from > the viewpoint of system services. > > > and Mac users. > > > If GNU C can produce executables for a platform, so can GNU Pascal. GNU Pascal doesn't understand Logflash. At all. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/