Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:57:44 -0400

Nick NICHOLAS wrote:

>>>From the Wiki: http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?cmene . Is there any
> official verdict on the usage of CMENE and selma'o, John?

It's certainly bogus to call CMENE a selma'o, though the internal
code of the parser does (as well as BRIVLA). In Lojban, a better
term such as vlalei would be preferred. Then there are 3 vlalei
and 120+ selma'o.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein