From jcowan@reutershealth.com Mon Aug 13 12:58:18 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 19:58:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 30883 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 19:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 19:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 19:58:16 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA18180; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:00:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B783138.3020806@reutershealth.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:57:44 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick NICHOLAS Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan Nick NICHOLAS wrote: >>>From the Wiki: http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/index.php?cmene . Is there any > official verdict on the usage of CMENE and selma'o, John? It's certainly bogus to call CMENE a selma'o, though the internal code of the parser does (as well as BRIVLA). In Lojban, a better term such as vlalei would be preferred. Then there are 3 vlalei and 120+ selma'o. -- There is / one art || John Cowan no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein