From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Aug 13 14:08:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 21:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 94106 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 21:07:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 21:07:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.203) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 21:07:28 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:07:28 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:07:28 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution? Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:07:28 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2001 21:07:28.0668 (UTC) FILETIME=[F5AF95C0:01C1243B] From: "Jorge Llambias" la djan cusku di'e >>John wrote this book. Paul doesn't know that, >>but Paul does know John. >> >>Does Paul know who wrote this book? No. >>Does Paul know this book's writer? Yes. > >This example is no good, for it equivocates on "know": >the second "know" is slabu. Which shows that "who wrote this book" refers to a fact while "this book's writer" refers to a person. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp