From pycyn@aol.com Mon Aug 13 16:32:55 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 23:32:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 11722 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 23:32:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 23:32:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d02.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.34)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 23:32:53 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.9.) id r.98.192886fe (3876)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 19:32:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <98.192886fe.28a9bd9b@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 19:32:43 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] New to lojban, any suggestions?
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_98.192886fe.28a9bd9b_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_98.192886fe.28a9bd9b_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 8/13/2001 6:23:17 PM Central Daylight Time, 
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> It's neither, really. It's a function of their security models, which
> 

So it is about HOW they do things, not WHAT they do, taking the latter in a 
black-box I=>O sense. That is going to make an emulator harder, though not 
impossible yet, and doesn't show quite that Linux can do something outside of 
Linux-defined tasks that MS can't. Still, it is a bit depressing from the 
point of view of sharing programs around.

--part1_98.192886fe.28a9bd9b_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/13/2001 6:23:17 PM Central Daylight Time, 
<BR>rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">It's neither, really. &nbsp;It's a function of their security models, which
<BR>are rather different, and their means of program execution.</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<BR>So it is about HOW they do things, not WHAT they do, taking the latter in a 
<BR>black-box I=&gt;O sense. &nbsp;That is going to make an emulator harder, though not 
<BR>impossible yet, and doesn't show quite that Linux can do something outside of 
<BR>Linux-defined tasks that MS can't. &nbsp;Still, it is a bit depressing from the 
<BR>point of view of sharing programs around.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_98.192886fe.28a9bd9b_boundary--

