From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Aug 13 19:08:01 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 14 Aug 2001 02:08:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 26863 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2001 02:08:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Aug 2001 02:08:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.153)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 02:08:00 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
  Mon, 13 Aug 2001 19:08:00 -0700
Received: from 200.69.11.213 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:08:00 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.69.11.213]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:08:00 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F153Z1i6bdVJWrGW6Ex000062d9@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Aug 2001 02:08:00.0287 (UTC) FILETIME=[F15E4AF0:01C12465]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la rob cusku di'e

>If you evaluate an abstraction the moment you hear it, you remove the part 
>of
>the sentence which gives it any meaning whatsoever. As I just mentioned 
>before
>(on the wrong thread, assuming this one had stopped), {mi djuno leni galtu 
>be
>la bob.} does not mean {mi djuno le pamuno centre}, because the second is 
>the
>first with the only part of the meaning that matters removed.

Of course. But {ni} is ambiguous, sometimes it refers to a number,
sometimes to an indirect question (or whatever we are calling it
this week).

>The HP49's programming language does not include the concept of layers of
>abstraction in this case. Lojban, OTOH, should if it is to be speakable at
>all, because we use layers of abstraction in ordinary communication much 
>more
>than we do in programming.

No doubt about it. But {le broda} is an instant evaluator, as you
put it (sometimes you want instant evaluation!) while {le du'u
makau broda} is not. It makes no sense mixing them up.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


