Subject: Re: [lojban] Second session on Record: anaphora

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:16:45 -0400 (EDT)

And Rosta scripsit:

> > But if bridi anaphora is
> > needed, perhaps it would be better to recognize that LE too starts a
> > subordinate bridi and then do without {nei}, thus avoiding one round of
> > paradoxes and yet covering all the practical cases (I think, but have not
> > pushed the process too far). ]
> 
> This is said too elliptically for me to understand what you mean.

LE does not start a subordinate bridi grammatically, although the selbri
in it logically implies a bridi.

-- 
John Cowan [email-masked]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter