From cowan@ccil.org Mon Aug 13 20:16:40 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 14 Aug 2001 03:16:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 59310 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2001 03:16:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Aug 2001 03:16:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 03:16:39 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15WUNE-00074g-00 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:56:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution? In-Reply-To: from Invent Yourself at "Aug 13, 2001 07:44:06 pm" To: Invent Yourself Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:55:40 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.comk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 448 Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Invent Yourself scripsit: > If the grammar says djuno x2 MUST be a du'u, then djuno lu'e is > grammatically incorrect. The grammar does not say that, nor does the gismu list, which says that a seldjuno is *semantically* a du'u. For a trivial example, consider: mi djuno le seldjuno be do -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter