From cowan@ccil.org Tue Aug 14 05:44:04 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 14 Aug 2001 12:44:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 60998 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2001 12:44:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Aug 2001 12:44:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta2 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 12:44:02 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15WdY8-00025s-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:44:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful In-Reply-To: from Nick NICHOLAS at "Aug 13, 2001 11:25:45 pm" To: Nick NICHOLAS Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:44:00 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Nick NICHOLAS scripsit: > 3) Never mind dikyjvo: if a selcmavo is not exactly the same thing as a se > cmavo, then what language *are* we speaking? *sigh* And I remember And arguing that selxxx *should* mean something different from se yyyyy, or why have 'em both? -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter