From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Aug 14 09:50:46 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 14 Aug 2001 16:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 46411 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2001 16:48:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Aug 2001 16:48:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 16:48:12 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA27738; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:50:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B795627.3000108@reutershealth.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:47:35 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: phma@oltronics.net Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010814072308.00bbd800@pop.cais.com> <01081411215304.02761@neofelis> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan Pierre Abbat wrote: > What about "du"? According to the cmavo list, it's in selma'o GOhA, but the > only difference between GOhA and BRIVLA is that GOhA can be followed by ra'o, > and "du ra'o" doesn't make sense. So could "du" be said to be in selma'o > BRIVLA? Originally "du" was in its own selma'o, DU, and was permitted only as a selbri_B_132 (IIRC). But I somewhat hastily over-generalized it into selma'o GOhA, thus permitting some highly dubious constructs like tanru with du. -- There is / one art || John Cowan no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein