Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:41:23 -0400

Jay Kominek wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, John Cowan wrote:

>>Originally "du" was in its own selma'o, DU, and was permitted only
>>as a selbri_B_132 (IIRC). But I somewhat hastily over-generalized it
>>into selma'o GOhA, thus permitting some highly dubious constructs like
>>tanru with du.
>>
> 
> Highly dubious?
> 
> It seems like it could be useful to make quick and imperfect statements
> about kinds of equality.
> 
> {mi junta du do}

It would be better to use dunli in such a case.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein