From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Tue Aug 14 18:33:39 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 15 Aug 2001 01:33:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 81834 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2001 01:33:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Aug 2001 01:33:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO relay3-gui.server.ntli.net) (194.168.4.200)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2001 01:33:37 -0000
Received: from m56-mp1-cvx2c.bre.ntl.com ([62.253.88.56] helo=andrew)
  by relay3-gui.server.ntli.net with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2)
  id 15WpJR-0007Px-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:17:38 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:32:41 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMMEDNEJAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010814072308.00bbd800@pop.cais.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

I seem to have deleted the original message for this thread, but I
can't see much wrong with {selma'o}. If it is supposed to mean
precisely {se cmavo}, then why not say {se cmavo}? {vlakle}
could be used for the cmevla/brivla/cmavo tritomy.

--And.