Subject: RE: [lojban] {lo'i} as a Q-kau solution?

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:30:41

la and cusku di'e

>OK. But if we had some way to talk about intensional categories
>(such that the class of goers is not the same thing as {J, P, M}),
>then our problem would be solved.

I think {lo'e} and {le'e} are the intensional gadri.

>How about -- I'm just
>floating this to see how it fares -- replacing {ma kau} with
>{ce'u}? Does this result in gross illogicalities, or in sentences
>which would then have competing interpretations?

Yes. All those that use both ce'u and makau, as in {frica le ka
makau viska ce'u} vs {frica le ka ce'u viska makau}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp