Subject: Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 21:44:22

la maikl cusku di'e

>maybe it's because we talk about weight as well as mass, the former being
>more important for everyday speech, but the latter being more
>fundamental.

That would explain why there is a word for weight instead
of one for mass, but it doesn't explain why there is a
word for either one of them at all. Other properties like
size, length, etc. didn't get a special word.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp