From pycyn@aol.com Thu Aug 16 09:44:29 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 16 Aug 2001 16:44:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 56083 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2001 16:43:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 Aug 2001 16:43:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m07.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.162)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 16:43:38 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com
  by imo-m07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.3.) id r.c8.193bb138 (3990)
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:43:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <c8.193bb138.28ad522e@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:43:26 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Second session on Record: anaphora
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c8.193bb138.28ad522e_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10531
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_c8.193bb138.28ad522e_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 8/13/2001 8:17:23 PM Central Daylight Time, 
a.rosta@ntlworld.com writes:


> > {no'a [xiPA]} This repeats the bridi PA levels up from the place where it
> > occurs. The default {no'a} = {no'axipa} the bridi in which the 
> occurrence is
> > immediately nested. The topmost bridi in the nesting chain (the one to 
> whose
> > sumti {vo'V} refer) is always reachable as {no'axiro}.
> 
> ADD:
> 
> One level down from {no'a xi ro} is {no'a xi da'a}, two levels down
> is {no'a xi da'a re}, etc.
> 

I'm not so sure about this addition. I think counting in one way is more 
than confusing enough (though it may be that counting down from the top is 
easier than up from the bottom). The Book nor usage seem to exclude this but 
I don't want to put it in as recommended or the result of this discussion. 


--part1_c8.193bb138.28ad522e_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/13/2001 8:17:23 PM Central Daylight Time, 
<BR>a.rosta@ntlworld.com writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">&gt; {no'a [xiPA]} &nbsp;This repeats the bridi PA levels up from the place where it
<BR>&gt; occurs. &nbsp;The default {no'a} = {no'axipa} the bridi in which the 
<BR>occurrence is
<BR>&gt; immediately nested. &nbsp;The topmost bridi in the nesting chain (the one to 
<BR>whose
<BR>&gt; sumti {vo'V} refer) is always reachable as {no'axiro}.
<BR>
<BR>ADD:
<BR>
<BR>One level down from {no'a xi ro} is {no'a xi da'a}, two levels down
<BR>is {no'a xi da'a re}, etc.
<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR>
<BR>I'm not so sure about this addition. &nbsp;I think counting in one way is more 
<BR>than confusing enough (though it may be that counting down from the top is 
<BR>easier than up from the bottom). &nbsp;The Book nor usage seem to exclude this but 
<BR>I don't want to put it in as recommended or the result of this discussion. 
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_c8.193bb138.28ad522e_boundary--

