From cowan@ccil.org Fri Aug 17 21:37:54 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 18 Aug 2001 04:37:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 53095 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2001 04:37:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Aug 2001 04:37:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2001 04:37:52 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15Xxs4-0001wg-00; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 00:38:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] mo In-Reply-To: from Jay Kominek at "Aug 17, 2001 10:05:57 pm" To: Jay Kominek Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 00:38:04 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Jay Kominek scripsit: > I'd guess you're correct. Only other possibility seems to be that you're > asking for n different answers (where n is the number of mo), to the same > question, or something. No, I think that is done with mo gi'e mo gi'e mo or the like. Of course two separated mo's makes good sense: mi mo le se du'u mo cusku vau mi klama le zarci vau -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter