From nicholas@uci.edu Sat Aug 18 16:54:59 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: nicholas@uci.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 18 Aug 2001 23:54:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 94615 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2001 23:54:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Aug 2001 23:54:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e4e.oac.uci.edu) (128.200.222.10) by mta1 with SMTP; 18 Aug 2001 23:54:58 -0000 Received: from [128.195.187.59] (dialin53c-49.ppp.uci.edu [128.195.187.59]) by e4e.oac.uci.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24619 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:54:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Sender: nicholas@e4e.oac.uci.edu Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:56:07 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Glub, blub, burble...gasp! From: Nick Nicholas >Are there any of the threads of the last inundation that I can consider done >enough to try to record them -- thereby firing them up again to the detriment >of the record? Inasmuch as I am about to issue several retractions (not because I have changed my mind, but because I am seeing noone is agreeing with me), not yet. >I somone watching the wiki and setting those discussions in order -- or at >least saving them until I get time (with a two year backlog!)? The {ce'u} posting was an attempt at characterising what got said there, but I'm starting to be disinclined to do any more of this. The wiki is now archived, but only for two weeks. However, its content tends to be permanent (people in general tend not to delete.) >Are there other discussion channels that need to be watched/recorded? I know of none such. That the wiki must now be watched, though, appears clear. Nick Nicholas, TLG, UCI, USA. nicholas@uci.edu www.opoudjis.net "Most Byzantine historians felt they knew enough to use the optatives correctly; some of them were right." --- Harry Turtledove.