From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Aug 21 08:47:55 2001
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 21 Aug 2001 15:47:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 2770 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 15:43:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Aug 2001 15:43:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 15:43:26 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11])
  by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05604;
  Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:45:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B82816C.1060707@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:42:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
Cc: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Toward a {ce'u} record
References: <sb828b00.084@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

And Rosta wrote:

> John:
> #In general, "ri" skips things where the meaning is the same on repetition:
> #"ri" skips "mi" and "do" and "ko'a" and "da". 
> 
> I think this rule needs further consideration and specification before it
> is made authoritative. "ro broda", "lo pa broda", "lo'i broda",
> "lo du'u/ka broda" would mean the same on repetition, but are
> they to be skipped?

No. I was talking of other KOhA, not complex sumti.

> (There's also the problem that "do" can change referents midsentence,
> unless Lojban excludes this by stipulation.)

True.

> (And then there's the contrast between:
> 1. Only Prince Charles remembers marrying Diana (True]
> 2. Only Prince Charles remembers him marrying Diana (False)
> 
> where in (2) a mere repeater anaphor is sufficient, while in (1)
> we require (as the marrier sumti) something different and more
> ce'u-like.)

(1) I think is a li'i (experience abstractor) case: P.C. po'o
-remembers le li'i ri -marries D. kei be ri. That way we need
no special machinery.

(2) is just P.C. po'o -remembers le nu ri -marries D.

-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel


