From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Aug 21 12:14:22 2001
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 21 Aug 2001 19:14:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 96971 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 19:13:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Aug 2001 19:13:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 19:13:27 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11])
  by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09029;
  Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:15:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B82B2A5.6060800@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:12:37 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
Cc: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: du'u in lieu of ka (was: Re: [lojban] Toward a {ce'u} record
References: <sb82bc56.090@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

And Rosta wrote:

> Ruloid 1.
> Zo'e fills any empty place. 
> [I *think* this is somewhere in Woldy.]
> 
> Ruloid 2.
> Zo'e cannot be construed as ce'u. 
> [Thus spake The Cowan, recently.]
> 
> Ruloid 3.
> Ce'u can be elided.

I meant that an explicit zo'e should probably not be construed as ce'u,
not that it cannot.

-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel


