From xod@sixgirls.org Tue Aug 21 12:19:53 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 21 Aug 2001 19:19:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 12844 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 19:18:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Aug 2001 19:18:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 19:18:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7LJIX327082 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:18:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:18:32 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban Subject: Re: du'u in lieu of ka (was: Re: [lojban] Toward a {ce'u} record In-Reply-To: <3B82B2A5.6060800@reutershealth.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, John Cowan wrote: > And Rosta wrote: > > > Ruloid 1. > > Zo'e fills any empty place. > > [I *think* this is somewhere in Woldy.] > > > > Ruloid 2. > > Zo'e cannot be construed as ce'u. > > [Thus spake The Cowan, recently.] > > > > Ruloid 3. > > Ce'u can be elided. > > I meant that an explicit zo'e should probably not be construed as ce'u, > not that it cannot. But an explicit one can be put in any empty space without changing the meaning of the sentence. That's what elision is. ----- "I have never been active in politics or in any act against occupation, but the way the soldiers killed Mizyed has filled me with hatred and anger. Now I'm ready to carry out a suicide attack inside Israel," one of the witnesses said.