From bob@RATTLESNAKE.COM Tue Aug 21 16:33:00 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: bob@rattlesnake.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 21 Aug 2001 23:33:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 38972 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 23:31:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Aug 2001 23:31:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (140.186.114.245) by mta3 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 23:31:40 -0000 Received: by rattlesnake.com via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.111) for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:31:18 +0000 (UTC) To: nicholas@uci.edu Cc: lojbab@lojban.org, lojban@yahoogroups.com, nicholas@uci.edu In-reply-to: (message from Nick NICHOLAS on Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: [lojban] Retraction, Part 1 Reply-to: bob@rattlesnake.com References: From: "Robert J. Chassell" Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > I will say first that if nothing else, Nick's reemergence into > active Lojban use provides a much more productive environment for > moving these discussions along towards possible consensus. Nick Nicholas responded: You have said this to me before privately, and I am no longer confident it is true. In particular with {ce'u} .... Lojbab is right! You underestimate yourself. You have been very important! Particular issues don't matter. On the whole, the various Loglans have been moving forward. (I have been sliding in and out of Loglan since 1960; I speak from personal observation {za'a}.) Lojban is a big project, with a whole variety of goods and bads; and our understanding of one and the other changes over time. -- Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com Rattlesnake Enterprises http://www.rattlesnake.com