Subject: Re: [lojban] Retraction, Part 1

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:05:59 -0400 (EDT)

Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit:

> I will note however, that there is no reason why, when the editor so 
> decides, the lessons cannot be Web published, even if LLG cannot afford to 
> print-publish at that point. It then becomes up to the editor or the Board 
> if he declines to decide, whether to make any revisions at some later point 
> when we have the money.

Sure. But they *are* web-published today, and have been for some time.
Web sites, like many works of art, tend to be abandoned rather than
finished.

That's why print comes across as more stable.

> >IMAO when the Book contradicts itself, the Book is in error,
> >period.
> 
> The Author speaks, and is the ultimate Authority %^)

I didn't realize you held that to still be true.

-- 
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [email-masked]
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan