From cowan@ccil.org Tue Aug 21 19:06:44 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 22 Aug 2001 02:06:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 13769 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 02:05:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2001 02:05:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mercury.ccil.org) (192.190.237.100) by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 02:05:48 -0000 Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15ZNP5-00031t-00; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:05:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] Retraction, Part 1 In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010821202500.00d1be40@pop.cais.com> from "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" at "Aug 21, 2001 08:28:31 pm" To: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:05:59 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-eGroups-From: John Cowan From: John Cowan Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit: > I will note however, that there is no reason why, when the editor so > decides, the lessons cannot be Web published, even if LLG cannot afford to > print-publish at that point. It then becomes up to the editor or the Board > if he declines to decide, whether to make any revisions at some later point > when we have the money. Sure. But they *are* web-published today, and have been for some time. Web sites, like many works of art, tend to be abandoned rather than finished. That's why print comes across as more stable. > >IMAO when the Book contradicts itself, the Book is in error, > >period. > > The Author speaks, and is the ultimate Authority %^) I didn't realize you held that to still be true. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan