From xod@sixgirls.org Tue Aug 21 22:39:00 2001
Return-Path: <xod@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 22 Aug 2001 05:39:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 1311 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 05:39:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2001 05:39:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 05:38:59 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
  by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7M5cr113821
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] x3 of du'u
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010822012700.00d468d0@pop.cais.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108220137490.13279-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:

> At 02:26 AM 8/22/01 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> >la xod cusku di'e
> > >If ka really is du'u, but now a controversial x2 ka is being discussed,
> > >does that become the x3 of du'u?
> >
> >No, x2 of ka would only work for single-ce'u ka. That's 99.99%
> >of the times one might want to use ka, I think.
> >
> >The only time I remember needing 2-ce'u properties is with {simxu},
> >does anybody else have an example where one would need them?
> >(I don't mean some statement about the language itself, but
> >something one might say in everyday talk.) Any 3-ce'u at all?
>
> This sounds like the death knell of x2 for ka, if there exists a known ka
> (simxu) that it could not apply to.


.uanaicai Did I miss something?




-----
"It is not enough that an article is new and useful. The Constitution
never sanctioned the patenting of gadgets. [...] It was never the object
of those laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every
shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously
occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of
manufactures." -- Supreme Court Justice Douglas, 1950



