Subject: Re: [lojban] ce'u

From: And Rosta <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:02:21 +0100

>>> John Cowan <[email-masked]> 08/19/01 04:03am >>>
#As to multi-ce'u abstractions, one question that has never been answered
#(perhaps not even raised) is what sort of thing a "ckaji be ka
#ce'u broda ce'u" is. It seems plausible to me that it is a Lojban sequence.
#Any thoughts?

My thought is that a multi ce'u ka/du'u is not a se ckaji. A se ckaji is a
ka/du'u containing exactly one ce'u.

#> That example is an error, and should be {le nu}.
#
#Indeed. IMHO it should be added to the Wiki errata list.

Though on the Wiki it is corrected to du'u, not to nu. How so?

--And.