From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Aug 22 12:27:59 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 22 Aug 2001 19:27:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20499 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 19:25:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2001 19:25:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 19:25:09 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20737; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:26:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B8406E0.2060900@reutershealth.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:24:16 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: And Rosta Cc: cowan , lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] ce'u References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan And Rosta wrote: > My thought is that a multi ce'u ka/du'u is not a se ckaji. > A se ckaji is a ka/du'u containing exactly one ce'u. Then how do we say "Doe and Roe are in the giver-recipient relationship wrt Blackacre [a piece of real property]"? I like la dos. ce'o la ros. cu ckaji le ce'u dunda la xekykram. ce'u Though arguably "terbri" is better than "ckaji". -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel