Subject: Re: [lojban] ce'u

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:24:16 -0400

And Rosta wrote:

> My thought is that a multi ce'u ka/du'u is not a se ckaji.
> A se ckaji is a ka/du'u containing exactly one ce'u.

Then how do we say "Doe and Roe are in the giver-recipient
relationship wrt Blackacre [a piece of real property]"?

I like la dos. ce'o la ros. cu ckaji le ce'u dunda
la xekykram. ce'u

Though arguably "terbri" is better than "ckaji".

-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel