Subject: Re: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du'

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:53:06 -0400

Nick NICHOLAS wrote:
> cu'u la djan:
> 
>>And Rosta wrote:
>>
> 
>>>1. inside ka: fill every logically-present but syntactically absent
>>>place with ce'u
>>>
> 
>>Certainly a plausible interpretation rule.
>>
> 
> So "le ka ce'u xendo" means by default "le ka ce'u xunre ce'u ce'u"? No,
> that's not what you want.

Ah. I was implicitly assuming that this rule was to apply
only in the absence of explicit ce'us.

-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <[email-masked]>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel