From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Aug 22 14:44:53 2001
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 22 Aug 2001 21:44:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 39952 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 21:42:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Aug 2001 21:42:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 21:42:08 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11])
  by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22680;
  Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:43:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B8426F9.9010702@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:41:13 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nick NICHOLAS <nicholas@uci.edu>
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du'
References: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0108221356310.27400-100000@e4e.oac.uci.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Nick NICHOLAS wrote:

> Looks baroque to me, but that doesn't count for much. So, if I say {le ka
> xendo}, accordingly to this, I'm not speaking about being kind, or
> receiving kindness, or being a standard for kindness, but some protean
> kindness-thing which is the property of no single entity, but of every
> entity involved.

No, it is a relation (the 3-place relation between a kind person, a
recipient of kindness, and a kind behavior). It is a reified
predicate of arity 3, just as one-ce'u leka-clauses are
reified predicates of arity 1.

According to the all-ce'u view, anyway.

> I still don't see how *every* place is ce'u, just like
> *no* place is ce'u, is any different... from du'u.

Not at all, but quite otherwise. A ledu'u-clause is a reified
predicate of arity 0.

> If we're going to blow up {le ka xendo} like this, I'd like
> to know what precisely we're gaining.

We are losing precision and gaining diddly. IMAO.

-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel


