From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Aug 23 06:18:40 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 23 Aug 2001 13:18:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 75659 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 13:16:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 23 Aug 2001 13:16:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.140) by mta3 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 13:16:56 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 06:16:56 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:16:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du'u Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:16:56 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Aug 2001 13:16:56.0878 (UTC) FILETIME=[E25BCCE0:01C12BD5] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >But then to talk about (platonic) Going, you'd have to have >ce'u ce'u ce'u ce;u ce'u klama, which is very longwinded. And rightly so, for it is not something we talk about often, or ever at all. >OTOH, by my excellent scheme: > >ka prami = Love >ka zo'e prami (ce'u) = du'u (zo'e) prami ce'u = belovedness >ka (ce'u) prami zo'e = du'u ce'u prami (zo'e) = loverhood > >So you can have things exactly as you want them, so long >as you use du'u rather than ka. That's not how I want them, because it reserves the shortest form for the least useful meaning. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp