From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Aug 23 06:25:48 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 23 Aug 2001 13:25:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 1483 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 13:25:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 23 Aug 2001 13:25:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.128) by mta3 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 13:25:04 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 06:25:04 -0700 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:25:04 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: ce'u co'e zo'e zo'e zo'e zo'e (was: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du'u Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:25:04 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Aug 2001 13:25:04.0535 (UTC) FILETIME=[05065A70:01C12BD7] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >but in "ka klama" gain an >easy way to say "ce'u ce'u ce'u ce'u ce'u klama" (which, btw, is not a >stilly thing to want to say; it is the sense of zo klama, and hence is >something >one may well wish to talk about). You may wish to talk about it when talking about language, probably a favourite topic of many Lojbanists, but not something very useful in a broader sense. And when talking about language, my proposal still allows {ka klama} to refer to the 5-ce'u abstraction, since that is what the context would require. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp