From brion@pobox.com Thu Aug 23 11:40:30 2001
Return-Path: <brion@pobox.com>
X-Sender: brion@pobox.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 23 Aug 2001 18:40:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 43666 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 18:39:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Aug 2001 18:39:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net) (207.217.120.74)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 18:39:29 -0000
Received: from there (209-162-46-113.thegrid.net [209.162.46.113])
  by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA06775
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200108231839.LAA06775@falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: sts- [was: RE: [lojban] Brochure updates
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:42:19 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
References: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEEOCDAA.raganok@intrex.net>
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEEOCDAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Brion L. VIBBER" <brion@pobox.com>

Craig wrote:
> I am not interested in learning new natural languages that don't have more
> speakers than Esperanto, certainly.

A fair decision. If neither the language itself nor the culture interests 
you, a small, dispersed speaker community lends little utility.

> As for reasons lojban offers more than natural languages, I predict that 
> due to its computer parseability and unambiguous structure Lojban is 
> likely to be the first langauge used by AI programs;
[..]

Yes, lojban is certainly fascinating and full of possibilities -- why do you 
think I'm here, too?

> I use word. I want to be able to type, because my handwriting is awful.

You've conveniently ignored the fact that you can download and install a 
keyboard driver in a few minutes and type away.

> >* You are only interested in languages with complete morphological
> >unambiguity (such as lojban).
>
> Not necessarily complete. Just enough that the speakers don't get into
> fights about how to say computer (or anything else) - yes, I've seen that
> happen in Esperanto.

That's a silly thing to say on this mailing list. No, we never get into 
fights about language usage *here*... :)

> However, the typing difficulties may contribute.

In the human mind, all manner of strange things are possible...

> And when I first looked at
> esperanto, I actually was a bit put off by the propaganda -

Propaganda and hype are the enemy of all good things. I'm certainly against 
misinformation and propaganda -- otherwise I wouldn't be bothering to argue 
with you here when my own lojban still isn't up to snuff.

-- brion vibber (brion@pobox.com / vibber@usc.edu)

