[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bpfk] The powers you give me I will lay down when this crisis has been abated!



  "It is with great reluctance that I have agreed to this calling. I
  love democracy. I love the Republic. The powers you give me I will
  lay down when this crisis has been abated! My first act, with this
  new authority, is to create a Grand Army of the Republic, to
  counter the increasing threat of the Separatists."

  --Palpatine announces the creation of the Grand Army of the
  Republic

I just thought I should be clear: it *is*, in fact, my intention to
put arbitrary amounts of work into cleaning everything up entirely
by personal fiat.  Y'all can oust me when it's done if you like.  :)
See my "what I'm going to do" post from a while back, but with less
community input.  :)

-Robin

----- Forwarded message from Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> -----

Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:27:49 -0300
From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] What I'm going to do.

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:28:32AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>>
>> Every January 1st. the BPFK publishes a very concise "State of the
>> Language" report, that looks something like this:
>
> Works for me.  You gonna tell them about your other idea?  :D

As you pointed out, the BPFK currently has a very informal structure.
The only structured part for now is the jatna position. Therefore,
until another structure develops, the yearly "State of the Language"
report will be issued by the jatna in the name of the BPFK, with the
final decision on its contents fully at the jatna's discretion.

Of course we all expect and know that the jatna will take the job
seriously and make whatever consultations they deem necessary before
acting, but the final decision is the jatna's alone. They might for
example prepare a draft report two weeks before January 1st, ask for
comments, and then make their decision based on the feedback they
receive, or whatever other method they find suitable to prepare the
report. The report is about the "State of the Language", not about the
"Final Definition of the Language from Here to Eternity", so there's
no reason to worry if it's not perfect in every minor detail.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.


----- End forwarded message -----
----- Forwarded message from Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> -----

Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:24:10 +0200
From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] What I'm going to do.

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 04:27:49PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:28:32AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> >>
> >> Every January 1st. the BPFK publishes a very concise "State of the
> >> Language" report, that looks something like this:
> >
> > Works for me.  You gonna tell them about your other idea?  :D
> 
> As you pointed out, the BPFK currently has a very informal structure.
> The only structured part for now is the jatna position. Therefore,
> until another structure develops, the yearly "State of the Language"
> report will be issued by the jatna in the name of the BPFK, with the
> final decision on its contents fully at the jatna's discretion.
> 
> Of course we all expect and know that the jatna will take the job
> seriously and make whatever consultations they deem necessary before
> acting, but the final decision is the jatna's alone. They might for
> example prepare a draft report two weeks before January 1st, ask for
> comments, and then make their decision based on the feedback they
> receive, or whatever other method they find suitable to prepare the
> report. The report is about the "State of the Language", not about the
> "Final Definition of the Language from Here to Eternity", so there's
> no reason to worry if it's not perfect in every minor detail.

That sounds like the right way of going about things. There is of course the slight risk that a rogue BPFKJ might do something reckless, but in any case they do not wield _absolute_ power - they report to the LLG, which can remove them, and revert their changes.

It is better to have a decision that stands unless a majority of the members are dissatisfied enough to reverse it, than to not have a decision at all unless everyone agrees.

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
Public Notice as Required by Law: Any Use of This Product, in Any
Manner Whatsoever, Will Increase the Amount of Disorder in the
Universe.  Although No Liability Is Implied Herein, the Consumer Is
Warned That This Process Will Ultimately Lead to the Heat Death of the
Universe.                           --Susan Hewitt and Edward Subitzky

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.


----- End forwarded message -----
----- Forwarded message from bancus <ted.reed@gmail.com> -----

Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 00:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: bancus <ted.reed@gmail.com>
To: BPFK <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [bpfk] Re: What I'm going to do.

On Oct 16, 12:27 pm, Jorge Llambías <jjllamb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As you pointed out, the BPFK currently has a very informal structure.
> The only structured part for now is the jatna position. Therefore,
> until another structure develops, the yearly "State of the Language"
> report will be issued by the jatna in the name of the BPFK, with the
> final decision on its contents fully at the jatna's discretion.
>
> Of course we all expect and know that the jatna will take the job
> seriously and make whatever consultations they deem necessary before
> acting, but the final decision is the jatna's alone. They might for
> example prepare a draft report two weeks before January 1st, ask for
> comments, and then make their decision based on the feedback they
> receive, or whatever other method they find suitable to prepare the
> report. The report is about the "State of the Language", not about the
> "Final Definition of the Language from Here to Eternity", so there's
> no reason to worry if it's not perfect in every minor detail.
>

For what it's worth, I agree with all of this and believe that Robin
would excel as this sort of jatna.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.


----- End forwarded message -----
----- Forwarded message from Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com> -----

Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 12:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lindar <lindarthebard@yahoo.com>
To: BPFK <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [bpfk] Re: What I'm going to do.

> For what it's worth, I agree with all of this and believe that Robin
> would excel as this sort of jatna.

Second.

I believe that Robin has always had the best interest in mind for the
language, has always had the perfect insight, and is a perfect balance
between Arnt's "No." policy and Jorge's "Well if we accept my proposal
on X..." policy.

So, my vote goes to Robin.
(Can I be vice-jatna?)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.