[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bpfk-announce] Re: gadri Update; Please Respond! Pretty please.

At 04:07 PM 7/3/04 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
I propose that we add the following two sections to the gadri

    * Grammatical Pro-sumti KOhA7 KOhA8
    * Subordinators NOI GEhU KUhO VUhO GOI ZIhE

I'm willing to shepherd one or both, but I would of course love it if
someone else wants to do it.  In particular, I'm not entirely certain of
the sufficiency of my understanding of ce'u.

Having added these in, I further propose that we give it another month,
and if we haven't acheived something that looks like consensus, we move
on to something else.

Please tell me what you think of this plan, because I could really use
some feedback right now.

Approve greatly.

Keep pushing along pieces of the whole, without insisting on anything that suggests we are making a final decision, especially when it is understood that something is changing, until we have everything done to the same level, and I won't complain (as much %^). We don't really need consensus on anything at this stage to move on, we need lots of chunks defined so that people can mull over them for a while.

This is an approach that comes closer to what I am looking for than the status quo. Spend a couple weeks on each topic and move on to the next whether we have consensus or not. Consensus will eventually develop without being pushed, if it can develop.


lojbab                                             lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org