Re: [bpfk] Uniqueness across quantification.

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:03:05AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
 
> If what you want to say is that three humans share one house, you
> could say:
> 
>   lo ci remna cu kansi'u lo ka xabju lo (pa) zdani
> 
> If you want to say that they each live in a different house, I
> would suggest:
> 
>   ro lo ci remna cu xabju lo frica zdani
> 
> which is not logically rigorous, but it's clear enough. If you do
> need logical rigour, I don't see any way other than multiple
> sentences.

What would those multiple sentences be?

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false"
is "na nei".   My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.