Re: [bpfk] Uniqueness across quantification.

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:03:05AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>
>> If what you want to say is that three humans share one house, you
>> could say:
>>
>>   lo ci remna cu kansi'u lo ka xabju lo (pa) zdani
>>
>> If you want to say that they each live in a different house, I
>> would suggest:
>>
>>   ro lo ci remna cu xabju lo frica zdani
>>
>> which is not logically rigorous, but it's clear enough. If you do
>> need logical rigour, I don't see any way other than multiple
>> sentences.
>
> What would those multiple sentences be?

I was referring to something like what you had:

>>> 2.  Is there a decent, short way to handle this rigorously?  {ro le
>>> ci zdani cu se xabju pa le ci remna .i je re le ci remna cu xabju pa
>>> le ci zdani} is the best I've found, and it's pretty shitty.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.