Re: [bpfk] Re: The Case for UI.

[Daniel Brockman <dbrockman@gmail.com>]

> So... I can tell this has already been shot out of the water. =D
>
> Any serious opinions either way?

You don't think xorxes's opinion (all emotional indicators are vague
as to whether the sentence is an assertion or a hypothetical, although
some are usually used with hypothetical sentences due to the emotion
most often occurring simultaneously as someone compares alternate
universes, and some are usually used with assertions due to the
emotion usually occurring as someone experiences or thinks about a
fact, and you can always force one or the other using {da'i} or
{ju'a}) is a serious one? Which by the way xalbo already seconded and
incidentally I happen to agree with and find a very elegant and lucid
way of defining these semantics.

I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that most experienced
Lojbanists would probably agree with xorxes's definitions once they'd
read and understood them and would probably benefit from doing so.

What confusion/disagreement remains, Lindar?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.