On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:42:11AM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote:
>> If the standard format is needed for
>> some technical reason,
>
> It probably will be, but not soon. If you have a suggestion for a
> format that will display the same information in a way that doesn't
> annoy you, *please* feel free to share.
I think we already discussed this, but anyway:
The standard format is so cluttered that I find the pages with that
format just unreadable. I have no idea if anyone else besides me uses
these BPFK pages as reference material, I only use the UI pages for
reference, because that's the only selma'o which I know has some
useful cmavo that I don't always remember. All the other selma'o I
either already know by heart, or I already decided is useless, so I
don't really need to visit, but the UI pages I do need.
The standard format is painful because it is mostly repetitive titles
and the actual content is strategically hidden from view. Instead of
highlighting the cmavo you are looking for, it highlights all the
irrelevant wordage.
Unfortunately, I'm not very good at designing. I can tell you that the
design is awful, but I can't really help with concrete suggestions so
that the resulting format is useful both to humans and computers. I
just complain crankily from time to time in the hopes that somehow it
will get better.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
--